Martina Capurro Taborda vs Nadine Keller Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L L L L
Form
L W L L L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Taborda 3 - 0 Keller
They have played 6 sets in total, with Taborda winning 6 and Keller winning 0. The last match between Taborda and Keller was at the W15 Sao Paulo, 14-05-2022, Semifinals, Clay with Martina Capurro Taborda getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martina Capurro Taborda | 3 |
| Nadine Keller | 0 |
W15 Sao Paulo(14-05-2022)
6
3
6
3
| Taborda | Stats | Keller |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 597 | Ranking | 850 |
| 149 | Highest Rank | 416 |
| 27 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (218-146) | Career Total W/L | 55% (139-116) |
| $1,020 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Noskova VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Nadine Keller
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Nadine Keller
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Nadine Keller
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 37 | Games Won | 18 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:38:0 | Average Match Time | 1:38:0 |
| 77% (140/182) | 1st Serve % | 62% (121/196) |
| 66% (93/140) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (69/121) |
| 50% (21/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (33/75) |
| 50% (13/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (4/16) |
| 48% (94/196) | Return Points Win % | 37% (68/182) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martina Capurro Taborda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Florencia Urrutia
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
79%
(
59 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
76 of
106)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angela Fita Boluda
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Paloma Goldsmith Weinreich
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nadine Keller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Arina Bulatova
Player
Nadine Keller
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Luana Plaza Araujo
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
35%
(
6 of
17)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
12 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
29
Total Points Won
18
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Sacco
Player
Nadine Keller
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
76 of
100)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
58 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alyssa Reguer
Player
Nadine Keller
56%
(
63 of
112)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Sara Lanca
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Nadine Keller
79%
(
64 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Perelygina
Player
Nadine Keller
91%
(
50 of
55)
1st Serve %
92%
(
54 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suana Tucakovic
Player
Nadine Keller
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Agustina Chlpac
Player
Nadine Keller
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (218/146) | Win/Loss | 55% (139/116) |
| 59% (476/334) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (312/256) |
| 55% (3918/3240) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2680/2442) |
| 46% (19/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (72/56) |
| 62% (198/122) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (58/54) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (9/6) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 126 | Aces Total | 51 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 944 | Total Double Faults | 839 |
| 1:20:27 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 464.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 501.9 |
| 70% (12571/17868) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8225/12663) |
| 58% (7293/12571) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (4634/8225) |
| 45% (2384/5302) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1961/4439) |
| 50% (1209/2403) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (919/1819) |
| 48% (8491/17635) | Return Points Win % | 49% (6386/12995) |
| 0% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (6/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (100/73) | Challenger W/L | 48% (44/48) |
| 63% (111/64) | Futures W/L | 58% (95/68) |
| 59% (212/358) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (132/247) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (27/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (21/40) |
| 47% (40/85) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (26/67) |
| 89% (219/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (154/127) |
| 11% (219/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (154/26) |
| 15% (144/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (100/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
